( STILL , CONSTANTLY DISTORT THE MEANING BY MANIPULATIONG SPEALLING)



TITTLE:
Apropos" science cycling - see BUSHLAND EMPTY DANCE
AROUND ONTOLOGY, as if they knew what they talk about.

This only after Wikipedia, a sensibly flexed tool.
"A central branch of metaphysics is ontology, the investigation into
what types of things there are in the world and what relations these
things bear to one another. The metaphysician also attempts to clarify
the notions by which people understand the world, including existence,
objecthood, property, space, time, causality, and possibility.

Before the development of modern science, scientific questions were
addressed as a part of metaphysics
known as "natural philosophy"; the term "science" itself meant
"knowledge" of epistemological origin.

IF THAT IS TRUE; I STUDIES IT ACCURATELY THAN, THAT SYSTEMATIC STUDY
IN ONTOLOGY LEADS TO ADDRESSING THE SINGLE SCIENCES, AND THEY DO NOT
HAVE ANY INTRINSIC CONFLICT WHEN WE FINELY GRASP THE BUT THAT WE WERE
NOT THERE YET ( how else does that make sense? the division above is
made up by..Bushland - how else not to know that).

HALLO ; ONTOLOGY WAS NEVER NON-SCIENCE; BUSHLAND MANIPULATED AS TO
RESERVE SELF EMPIRICAL PART (HALLO -WQ E ARE NOT JEALEUS - PLEASE DO,
REMEBERING THAT STRICTLY EMPIRICAL MEANS LABOLATORY ONLY).

BUSHLAND, PHILOSOPHY WAS, IS AND WILL BE THEORETICAL SCIENCE.


' The scientific method, however, made natural philosophy an empirical
and experimental activity
SINCE WHEN THE  TWO ARE DIFFERENT TERMS
unlike the rest of philosophy, and by the end of the eighteenth
century it had begun to be called "science" in order to distinguish it
from philosophy.
PHILOSOPHY STOOD AS SCIENCE - YOU ARE MAKING IT UP SINCE YOU HAVE
REFUSED STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND HAVE THEORETICAL DEFICITS
Thereafter, metaphysics became the philosophical enquiry of a non-
empirical
character into the nature of existence.
SEE THEM MANIPULATORS!
 Thus the original situation of metaphysics being integral with
(Aristotelian) physics and science, has, in the West, become reversed
so that scientists often consider metaphysics antithetical to the
empirical sciences.
I DO NOT THINKS SO - THAT IS WHAT YOU DO.

THANK YOU FOR MAKING WIKIPEDIA STRUGLES WITH DEFINITIONS SO EXPLICIT
 AS TO HAVE SHOWN COMPLETE CYCLE AT WHICH NOTHING CAN GET RESOLVED
- JUST A LITTLE DANCE AROUND THERE.

( I SUPPOSE THAT THIS ONE WOULD BE ANTI-PHILOSOPHICAL, THUS YOU
HAVE PROVEN NOTHING IN THIS LITTLE IDEOLOGICAL PITCH , JUST DANCING
THE CIRCLE; BUT EVEN THAN YOUR THESES HAS ITS ANTI-THESES)


To stand explicit - to continue philosophy one needs the goal for the
dicourse.
Plenty of it since we are unfinished products and since the human
consciusness
actualy is believed to be evolving. To progress reasnably one needs to
look into
if not a comprehnesive model of reality to at least unreasolved
problems.
since Bushland killed the main theoretical body of Philosophy, its
onthology
and it is not there any more, thus  can not go beypoon the experinced
experiment
that  ends narowly ( if its own rigors are apo,lied; this non-existing
ontology
also kills Bushland sharp). How can I be more explicit?

THE REALITY OR REALITOES OF SCIENCE TODAY ARE SUCH THAT THE DETAIL
RESEARCH HAS GROWN WHILE THE THEORETICAL ADVANCEMENTS STAGNATED
UNEVENLY, THUS PROGRESS IN THE HUMAN CONDITIONS WILL DEPEND ON IT
MORE AND MORE AND NOT ON ONE MORE EXPERIMENT ( very old dilemma, that
led to overvaluing experiment or misapplying it naturalistically on
purpouse and clugging
the minds that once someone calls something experiment when conditions
for iut do
not exists, it is; it is but a form of fraud)

FOR EXAMPLE , NO MORE NUKE,- THE PURELY EXPERIMENTAL DERIVATIVE DOES
IT;
THE THEORY OF WHAT, HOW AND FOR WHAT IS NUKE AS  FRIENDLY ENERGY WILL.
WE KIND OF READY FOR THE DILEMMA TOO - WE LIVE IT. THIS WILL INCLUDE
ADVANCEMENT IN OUR HUMAN CONSCIEUSNESS, EVEN IF WE WILL
EXPERIMENTALLY
PRODUCE IT OR DO - THE CYCLE WILL RETURN TO THE POINT THAT WE WILL
NEED
TO HAVE MORE THAN MACHINE OF US, TO BECAME EXPLICIT AGAIN.