Grupy dyskusyjne   »   pl.soc.polityka   »   A ile brzydkich rzeczy potrzebujemy w nauce? ( Reflecje Revolucji A)

A ile brzydkich rzeczy potrzebujemy w nauce? ( Reflecje Revolucji A)

Data: 2009-03-22 13:21:18
Autor: Me
A ile brzydkich rzeczy potrzebujemy w nauce? ( Reflecje Revolucji A)

"Man uses his finger as 2GB memory stick


Jerry Jalava, a young man from Finland, has all chances to become the
world’s first cyborg. A part of his body has been equipped with the
Linux Operating System. The man designed several programs for his
finger, which works as a USB drive "

.............

THE STRUCTURAL OVERGROWTH WITH FASTER NOW SPEED OF DEVELOPMENT
IN SCIENCE PRODUCES SCIENCE MUTANTS.

The FVU has elicited the patterns when differrent mutants show up in
the process. While some mutants in the nature might be inevitable, as
human do not control all alredy running processes, for the part that
we do - IT IS THE UGLY THING TO PRODUCE MUTANTS. CHEMICALLY AND
BIOLOGICALLY MUTANTS ARE POISON MADE OF CLEANING THE OVERLOADED
SYSTEM. In biology they sometimes look nice or perform
to balance systems, like many fast growing mashroom, especially red,
compromoze two plants in
the area that is poluted with dirty paticles ( currenty seen around
the USA Capital); ginco - that overgrows
under the nuk leak ( mutant tree only) and many otehrs

THE REVOLUTION ON THE WASHINGTON MALL GAVE FIRST TO ART AND
ENTARTAINMENT BEFORE THE FULL BLOW OF THE SCIENCE SPEAR BE VISIBLE.
THAT ART CAN BE REFLECTED IN TERMS OF THE ABOVE OBSERVATION. IT IS THE
UGLY THING, WITH THE BIG MAN ( TOO BIG) TURNING UGLY
( FROM  EXTREMELY ESTATIC OTERWISE).

How do we this days think about such different events seeming far
apart by some intuitions, yet having something in common - WHAT IS
THAT SOMETHING?

HOW WE ARE TO UNDERTSTANT THIS SUPPOSED ADVANCE IN TE FINGER; MY
FEELINGS PUT IT IN THE CATHEGORY OF MUTANT BETWEEN THE TWO IN THE
POLUTED MILIEU? Am I wrong?

i am bringing this processual sample intentionaly to look why current
science, current intellectual style is relactant to look at, while itb
is so im=nfgormative and even instructional - prtedictive on what to
do with UGLY
THING.

This part of the "A Revolution" is clearly in the eye of the Beholder,
yet need to be moved - we getting behind understanding why the
observation I am briging upm from the differrent level of abstraction
work together well.

FVU has more on these matters.

A ile brzydkich rzeczy potrzebujemy w nauce? ( Reflecje Revolucji A)

Nowy film z video.banzaj.pl więcej »
Redmi 9A - recenzja budżetowego smartfona